Single in Your 40s

Dating without starting over

How do I know if someone new is lying?

Mostly, you don't know from their face, and research says almost nobody can. In your 40s, though, a person comes with a whole life attached, so what you can check is whether their story holds together over a few months.

Mostly, you can’t tell by watching someone, and the research says almost nobody can. What you can do is notice whether their story holds together over weeks, and check the few parts that matter to you against things you can actually see.

Why can’t you just tell?

Because the tells you’ve heard about (looking away, fidgeting, too much detail) don’t work. In a large review of 206 studies covering 24,483 judges, Charles Bond and Bella DePaulo found that people trying to spot lies in real time were right 54% of the time, barely better than guessing.1 People were better at recognizing truths (61%) than lies (47%), which means most of us lean toward believing what we hear.1

So how do lies actually come out? When Hee Sun Park, Timothy Levine and colleagues asked people about real lies they had uncovered, very few were caught in the moment from someone’s behavior.2 They came out later, through a friend who mentioned something, a receipt or a photo, a detail that didn’t match what the person already knew, or a confession.2

That’s good news, actually. It means you don’t need to become a human lie detector over dinner. You need time, and a life that overlaps with theirs a little more each month.

How much do people shade the truth on a profile?

Some, almost everyone, and mostly in small ways. In a study led by Catalina Toma, Jeffrey Hancock and Nicole Ellison, researchers measured the height, weight and age of 80 online daters in New York and compared them with their profiles.3 About 81% were off on at least one of the three, but usually by only a little.3 Men tended to add height, women tended to trim weight.3

Photos get the same polish. In a follow-up study of 54 online daters, the daters rated their own profile pictures as fairly accurate, but independent judges rated about a third of them as not accurate, often because the photo was older or retouched.4

So picture Renee, 46. She’s been seeing Mark for five weeks. His profile says 6’0”, and he’s maybe 5’10”. His photos are from a better haircut. None of that tells her much about whether he’s honest about the things that matter to her: whether he’s really single, whether he wants a relationship, whether his job and his kids are what he says. A polished profile is the normal background noise. The questions worth asking are about the life, not the photos.

Does being in your 40s change anything?

A little, and mostly in your favor.

In a study of 1,005 people aged 6 to 77, Evelyne Debey and colleagues found that how often people said they lied peaked in adolescence and dropped through adulthood, and that skill at lying peaked in young adulthood and declined after that.5 That’s an average across a lot of people, not a promise about the person across the table. But it’s a reason not to start from the assumption that everyone your age is running a game.

The bigger advantage is structural. At 25, a new person can be almost anyone. At 45, they usually come with a whole life: a job, maybe kids, an ex, a sibling who calls on Sundays, a house or a lease, friends from twenty years ago. A real life leaves traces, and those traces show up naturally over a few months if you’re both letting each other in.

The disadvantage is that you also come with a history. If your last relationship ended with a lie you didn’t see coming, your mind may now be scanning for the next one. That vigilance can make an ordinary slip (he got the date of his trip wrong) feel like a confession.

What’s worth checking, and what isn’t?

When something feels off, try separating four things before you react.

  • What happened. Only what was said or done. “She said she’s been single a year. Tonight she mentioned a breakup in March.”
  • The reading. What you think it means. “She lied about her timeline.”
  • The fear. What it touches. “I’m being fooled again.”
  • The next step. Something you can do. “Ask her, lightly, which it was.”

Then ask whether the thing actually matters. A trimmed age by a year or two? Probably not, and you’ll see the real one eventually. Whether they’re still living with an ex, still married on paper, or still dating three other people while saying they’re not? That matters, and you’re allowed to ask it plainly.

What tends to be useful over the first few months:

  • Consistency over time. Do the stories about their week, their family and their past stay the same when they come up again?
  • Overlap. Are you slowly meeting the people in their life, and are they curious about yours?
  • Follow-through. Do small plans happen, or do they keep almost happening?

None of these tell you what’s in someone’s heart. They tell you whether their words and their life line up, which is the part you can see.

When is it bigger than a small fib?

Some patterns deserve a pause no matter how good the chemistry is: a person who always has a reason not to meet in person or on video, a life you never get any window into after months, or any request for money from someone you’ve known only a short time. Those aren’t puzzles to solve by reading them better. They’re reasons to slow down and talk to a friend you trust.

And if the checking has started to take over (you’re up at night cross-referencing things they said, or you can’t enjoy a single date), that’s worth attention for its own sake. If distrust is persistent and is spilling into your sleep, work or friendships, a licensed therapist is the right kind of help.

What the research doesn’t show

  • Lie-detection studies mostly use strangers and short clips, not people who have been dating for months.
  • The profile study measured height, weight and age, not the things most people actually worry about, like relationship status.
  • The lifespan study is an average. It can’t tell you whether one particular person is honest.
  • Survey answers about what’s ‘common’ on the apps are impressions, not counts.

What to do this week

  • Play the sort above and notice which of your current worries landed in the Guess bin.
  • Write down the one question that actually matters to you, the one about their life, not their photos.
  • Ask it in daylight, in a calm moment. “You mentioned the paperwork isn’t final. Where are things, really?” is a fair question at month two.
  • Listen for a simple answer. Honest answers are often a little boring.
  • Let the next month do some of the work. Real lives show up over time. Give this one the chance to, or to not.

Try it

Evidence or guess? Sort what you actually know about them from what you're filling in

  1. 1/6 His profile says 'divorced.' Over dinner he mentions the lawyer still has the final paperwork.

    Evidence. Two things he said don't match, and both are his own words. That's worth a calm question. It is not proof of anything, because 'divorced' is often shorthand for 'it's over, the paperwork isn't.'

  2. 2/6 She looked away when you asked about her ex, so she's hiding something.

    Guess. Looking away is a behavior. 'Hiding something' is a reading of it, and research says readings like that are barely better than a coin flip. She may simply not love talking about her ex on date three.

  3. 3/6 He said he was out of town last weekend, then mentioned his son's Saturday game here.

    Evidence. This is an inconsistency with something you already know, which is how most real lies come out. It could also be a mix-up about which weekend. Ask, and listen to whether the answer is simple.

  4. 4/6 Her photos look a few years old, so everything she says is probably invented.

    Guess. Small profile polishing is extremely common. A flattering photo tells you about her photo choices, not about whether the rest of her life is real.

  5. 5/6 For three months he has been 'about to' introduce you to a friend, with a new reason each time.

    Evidence. This is a pattern over time, which is the most useful thing you can watch. It doesn't tell you why. It does tell you what to bring up next.

  6. 6/6 She's warm so fast that she must be playing you.

    Guess. Warmth is not a tell. Some people are just open. If you're bracing against kindness, that may be about the last relationship, not this person.

0 to 2 right

Your guesses are doing most of the talking

That's very common after a hard ending. The guesses feel like protection, but they mostly add noise. Try writing down only what was said and done this week, and see how much shorter the list gets.

3 to 4 right

You can spot the facts, and the fear still slips in

You know the difference most of the time. The tricky ones are the moments that echo something from your past. Those are the ones to slow down on before you decide what they mean.

5 to 6 right

You're tracking the right things

You're watching for consistency over time rather than reading faces. Keep doing that, and turn the one real question on your list into an actual conversation.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the date you loved but still can't quite figure out.See your pattern

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Bella DePaulo

Research and writing on single life, including people who choose to stay single and live full lives on their own terms.

Social psychologist (PhD, Harvard); academic affiliate, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, UC Santa Barbara · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Lori Gottlieb

What happens in the therapy room, including breakups, dating choices and the stories people tell about love.

Psychotherapist; author of Maybe You Should Talk to Someone and The Atlantic's Dear Therapist column · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Marisa G. Franco

Friendship, loneliness and belonging, and how adults make and keep close friends.

Licensed counseling psychologist; PhD in Counseling Psychology, University of Maryland, where she teaches · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Pepper Schwartz

Research and writing on love, sex and relationships, including dating and partnership later in life.

Sociologist (PhD, Yale); Professor Emerita of Sociology, University of Washington · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 8 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Accuracy of deception judgmentsPersonality and Social Psychology Review (Bond and DePaulo), 2006Used for: A meta-analysis of 206 documents and 24,483 judges found that people trying to tell lies from truths in real time, without special aids or training, were right 54% of the time on average, correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as truthful.
  2. How people really detect liesCommunication Monographs (Park, Levine, McCornack, Morrison and Ferrara), 2002Used for: When people recalled a lie they had discovered in real life, most lies were uncovered through information from third parties, physical evidence, inconsistency with what the person already knew, or a later confession, rather than through the liar's behavior at the time, and lies were typically discovered well after they were told.
  3. Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating ProfilesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Toma, Hancock and Ellison), via Stanford Social Media Lab, 2008Used for: 80 online daters (40 men, 40 women) in New York City had their height, weight and age measured and compared with their profiles. About 81% deviated on at least one of the three, but the deviations were usually small in magnitude. Men misstated height more and women misstated weight more.
  4. Putting Your Best Face Forward: The Accuracy of Online Dating PhotographsJournal of Communication (Hancock and Toma), via Stanford Social Media Lab, 2009Used for: In a study of 54 online daters' profile photographs, the daters rated their own photos as fairly accurate, but independent judges rated about one third of the photos as not accurate. Women's photos were judged less accurate and were more likely to be older, retouched or professionally taken.
  5. From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deceptionActa Psychologica (Debey, De Schryver, Logan, Suchotzki and Verschuere), 2015Used for: In a community sample of 1,005 people aged 6 to 77, self-reported lying frequency rose in childhood, peaked in adolescence and decreased during adulthood, while lying proficiency peaked in young adulthood and declined through later adulthood.
Up nextIs this a red flag, or is it my anxiety?